OK, USA!
Here’s a good discussion: click. Lots of voices but worth your while.
Why were opponents of the war with Iraq insistent on UN approval when they often condoned military action in Kosovo (i.e. Michael Moore)? Milosevic would lose to Saddam in a who’s-done-worser-things contest. That just seems to throw principle out the window. Just seems more like party allegiance.
Or just read the article…here. These be important times! In terms of character, Joe Lieberman would be a good president except that he’s such a weakly man in front of the camera. John Edwards actually offers legitimate, principled ideas but it just won’t happen… he’s offered the most specifics in terms of policy; it’s impressive. And man! he keeps it generally positive. Watch him in debates and read the stuff he offers. You may not agree with him but he’ll at least gain your respect. Kerry is all discombobulated; he keeps changing his message. Howard Dean is more divisive than Bush (and Bush is a pretty divisive figure)! I’m disturbed that he finds it gleeful if/when things go badly for troops or public safety. Out of every major candidate, he’s the only one I can’t imagine visiting troops to a warm reception; even Hillary Clinton was well-accepted. One thing most Democrats (DLC) and all Republicans will agree on is that Howard Dean leading the United States is a scary thing.
He just has a really active base of voters that are pushing the debate to the left.
He says that America isn’t any safer since 9-11. Then why did he support the effort in Afghanistan? He says he would’ve wholeheartedly supported an attack on Iraq with UN approval. I don’t see how UN approval makes the US any safer. It isn’t a consistent message.
Imagine Hussein on trial, facing the evidence of mass murder, etc. That would overshadow any election… and the facts would look very bad for Dean (who said he supposes it’s a good thing that Saddam is removed… they’ll keep playing soundbites). If you’re a Democrat, trust me, you don’t want Dean to run against Bush. If you’re a Bush fan, you’ll root for Dean in the coming primaries. If you’re a Democrat, Wesley Clark is your best shot at beating the President.
But the democratic party is all mixed up these days. For better or worse, Bush is the only one who’s offered a consistent vision/theme for foreign policy.
I just don’t see how it’s the disaster (to quote) that some people (Dean) are making it out to be. Even with UN troops and support, do we really think attacks would end? Shoot, all it takes is hatred and will to ambush people; daily, people get mugged in alleys all across the US. Rebuilding will take years and will cost lives; that’s the case no matter what your process or who your president. That’s history speaking.
So, who knows how Iraq will turn out. But we’re talking about building a democracy out of nothing! Sure, there are oil contracts and the like, but since when was a free-market such an evil thing? Name one democracy that doesn’t allow for such investment. A lot more money is going to go to the Iraqi people now than when Saddam was siphoning dough through the UN Oil-for-Food program. Their overall food and water infrastructure is so much better now. To the resentment of many, women have more rights (read about how they form a huge part of the Iraqi border patrol). That’s all still something to be proud of.
And exit strategy? Man, we’re still in Kosovo and South Korea(!); if a stable Iraq is the goal, there may not be an exit strategy. There are only options to lessen the American financial and military burden. But a democracy in the heart of the Middle East!
It bothers me when I hear people speak of the left as being for the people and the right as being for special interests; there are special interests on all sides! That’s just politics! NPR had a great piece following the evolution of a well-meaning local politician; it was amusing and disturbing. In that world, it takes a lot of compromise to get anything done – that’s either really disillusioning or well, reality.
——

Breaking Away (Kathe Kollwitz)
—
horizon
When it rains
We are all the same person
Staring doe-eyed
Through ghostly reflections and
Cars passing hard
In a hurry.
When it’s cold
We are caught laughing,
Warming hands near
Bonfires of books
Loving and vanity.
When we wake
It’s midnight -
Caught in the salty
Webbing of
Living inertia.
——

Grief in Gaza (??)
—-
To Add:
Maybe it’s sad but politics aren’t really about the big picture or the long-term. Back when Mandela was pushing for nationwide suffrage, the Afrikaaners insisted that black Africans just weren’t educated enough to deserve a vote. Mandela replied that when it comes to voting, most people simply vote for one issue that they hold most dear. The farmer – regardless of race – will vote for the man who offers the biggest subsidies or a free cow to every yeoman. It’s seldom been about facts, it’s always been about promises.
It’s just life again. Even in our own lives, how often do ideas/beliefs and facts really matter? Oftentimes, it’s fine to learn just enough about our reasons to love/hate or believe/doubt God or Republicans or Democrats or romance or our neighbor’s windy stories. The full story is usually just too long. And there are too many full stories. I mean, I don’t want to know which fertilizer really has the best chemical compound blend, I want the one with pretty wrapping and lots of commercials on TV. And in the end, I don’t even buy fertilizer.
So how much of life is really about truth? Not as fact but as daily reality… not much. We’re all caught up in the momentum of all the stories that shape our view of what’s real. Hope, both under God and under the press of daily living, is all about promises; promises are all about possibility. So, we ride the wave and we’re moving, and as long as you call it Forward, we’re happy. Well, I’m happy.
Matt11:28
Recent Comments